Write as
|
(113) |
and substitute this into Eq. (112), giving an equation of ,
|
(114) |
Eq. (114) agrees with Eq. (35) in Porcelli's
paper[1]. For notation convenience, we define
as
|
(115) |
which can be called ``perturbed Lagrangian'' (I do not care the name of
, and
is only a notation without any
physical meaning since I do not need this meaning to derive anything). Since
we are considering toroidal symmetrical case, different toroidal harmonics of
perturbation are independent. Thus we can consider a single toroidal harmonic,
i.e, the dependence of components of
and
is
. Further due to that the
equilibrium is time-independent, we can consider a single time harmonic, i.e.,
the time dependence of the perturbation is
. Then, using
Eq. (115), Eq. (99) is written as
|
(116) |
and
in Eq. (98) is written as
|
(117) |
Using Eqs. (116) and (117), Eq. (114) is written as
|
(118) |
Define
|
(119) |
then Eq. (118) is written as
|
(120) |
Eq. (120) agrees with Eq. (40) in Porcelli's paper. Define
as
|
(121) |
then satisfies (note that
and
are both functions of constants of motion, thus can be
taken out of the orbit integration)
|
(122) |
YouJun Hu
2014-05-19