Gauge transformation of $ \Psi $

Next, we discuss the gauge transformation of the vector potential $ \mathbf{A}$ in the axisymmetric case. It is well-known that magnetic field remains the same under the following gauge transformation:

$\displaystyle \mathbf{A}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{new}}} =\mathbf{A}+ \nabla f,$ (9)

where $ f$ is an arbitrary scalar field. Here we require that $ \nabla f$ be axisymmetric because, as mentioned above, an axisymmetric vector potential suffices for describing an axisymmetric magnetic field. Note that, in cylindrical coordinates, $ \nabla f$ is given by

$\displaystyle \nabla f = \frac{\partial f}{\partial R} \hat{\mathbf{R}} + \frac...
...c{1}{R} \frac{\partial f}{\partial \phi} \hat{\ensuremath{\boldsymbol{\phi}}} .$ (10)

Since $ \nabla f$ is axisymmetric, it follows that $ \partial^2 f / \partial R
\partial \phi = 0$, $ \partial^2 f / \partial Z \partial \phi = 0$, and $ \partial^2 f / \partial \phi^2 = 0$, which implies that $ \partial f /
\partial \phi$ is independent of $ R$, $ Z$, and $ \phi $, i.e., $ \partial f /
\partial \phi$ is actually a constant. Using this, the $ \phi $ component of the gauge transformation (9) is written
$\displaystyle A_{\phi}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{new}}}$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle A_{\phi} + \frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial
f}{\partial \phi}$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle A_{\phi} + \frac{C}{R},$ (11)

where $ C$ is a constant. Note that the requirement of axial symmetry greatly reduces the degree of freedom of the gauge transformation for $ A_{\phi}$ (and thus for $ R A_{\phi}$, i..e, $ \Psi $). Multiplying Eq. (11) with $ R$, we obtain the corresponding gauge transformation for $ \Psi $,

$\displaystyle \Psi^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{new}}} = \Psi + C,$ (12)

which indicates $ \Psi $ has the same gauge transformation as the familiar electric potential, i.e., adding a constant. (Note that the definition $ \Psi
(R, Z) \equiv R A_{\phi}$ does not mean $ \Psi (R = 0, Z) = 0$ because $ A_{\phi}$ can have a $ 1 / R$ dependence under the gauge transformation (11)).

yj 2018-03-09